Thursday 30 January 2014

The Iraq Elections Commission Assigns Electoral Ticket Numbers

Posted by Reidar Visser on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 11:26



The Iraqi electoral commission (IHEC) today held a lottery for electoral ticket numbers for the upcoming 30 April parliamentary elections. Although a rough picture of the coalition-forming process has been in the public domain for some time, the information released today provides the first official confirmation of the electoral alliances that have been approved for participation in the election, following certification of individual entities towards the end of last year.

It should be noted that at the time of writing, the complete and official list of approved coalitions itself had not been published by IHEC, and that the following discussion is based on reports about the election list numbers as reported by the Iraqi press. However, the picture that emerges is consistent enough. Generally speaking, it is a story of fragmentation in all political camps. For example, the idea of a pan-Shiite list has hardly been on the agenda this year. Instead, all the major players run separately: Maliki’s State of Law (list 277), Hakim’s Muwatin (273), Sadr’s Ahrar (214), Fadila (219) and Jaafari’s Islah (205). A possible caveat concerns the Shiite-minority governorates (Salahaddin, Nineveh, Diyala). Lists sounding like variations of the Watani alliance of Shiites in parliament appear in all these places, and it could be pan-Shiite lists on the pattern seen in last year’s local elections. Confirmation of this must await release of the comprehensive IHEC coalition list, and possibly even the candidate lists themselves, expected in late February or early March.

Similarly, what was once the secular and increasingly Sunni-backed Iraqiyya has now fragmented into a number of factions. Parliament speaker Nujayfi’s Mutahhidun got list number 259; Allawi’s list now just called Wataniyya or “nationalism” got number 239; the Arab Iraqiyya bloc of deputy PM Mutlak got number 255.

With regard to the Kurds, the situation is slightly confused because both political entity numbers and coalition numbers have been published. Of these, there is little doubt that Goran and the Islamists will run separately, but the rationale for publishing the entity numbers for KDP and PUK alongside various coalition numbers is not clear. Again, it is possibly better to await publication of the candidate lists to see what sort of alliances the Kurds are running within the KRG and in Kurdish-populated areas outside the KRG respectively.

For the time being, the information available is too sketchy to make very firm conclusions about the overall direction of the upcoming elections. For example, candidate lists are needed to determine whether all Shiite parties are joining a common sectarian ticket in places like Salahaddin and Nineveh, or whether just a few take part. Instead, ongoing developments in the Iraqi parliamentary debate may perhaps provide some clues. Firstly, the recent announcements of new provinces in Nineveh and Salahaddin catering at least to some extent to Shiite Turkmen audiences could be a suggestion about a move towards a more sectarian electoral climate. On the other hand, attempts to create a parliamentary oversight committee to supervise the election commission itself have been spearheaded by Sadrists and Kurds, with Muwatin and State of Law resisting (and successfully defeating the motion). Whether the Hakim-Maliki relationship is still salvageable remains to be seen, but given the amount of fragmentation seen today it seems fairly clear that these elections are unlikely to produce a clear single winner. We are thus left with a situation in which post-election coalition building and maneuvering may prove as important for the final outcome as the elections themselves.

Wednesday 22 January 2014

WE SHALL NOT FORGET THEM


WE SHALL NOT FORGET THEM

17 OCAK 2014



The date of 16th January 1980 has a very important place in the history of the struggle of the Iraqi Turkmen.



Exactly 33 years have passed since the great Turkmen Leaders Assistant Professor Dr. Necdet Koçak, Retired Colonel Abdullah Abdurrahman, businessman Adil Şerif were executed and scientist Dr. Rıza Demirci died under torture by the old regime of Iraq. The great Turkmen leaders who were executed by the old regime of Iraq who are unforgettable heroes of the national cause the Turkmen walked to the execution stand with their heads held high.

Assistant Professor Dr. Necdet Koçak who was innocent of any crime and was executed as a result of the intimidation policy practiced by the Baas Party was an extraordinary personality, a valuable community leader. Assistant Professor Dr. Necdet Koçak who was devoted to his nation and cause spent his life in protecting the national identities of Turkmen and fighting to gain their political and cultural rights.

Retired Colonel Abdullah Abdurrahman who has executed was the head of Turkmen Brotherhood Group for many years. He traveled from village to village, town to town and was deeply involved in the problems of Turkmen. He enlightened the people regarding the national cause of the Turkmen everywhere he went.

Business Adil Şerif made many large material and spiritual sacrifices on behalf of the Turkmen national cause. He was a very beloved, respected and admired man.

The research carried out by esteemed scientist Dr. Rıza Demirci who succumbed to inhumane torture put the Turkmen population and their settlement areas onto the agenda. He was a man devoted to his nation, a courageous and enterprising man.

The execution of the leaders of Iraqi Turks has drowned the Turkmen community in infinite pain and sorrow. However history has shown us that national causes can only be won by the presence of those who believe that the cause is worth dying for. Like the great Turkish author and poet Mithat Cemal Kuntay said in one of his poems “Territory is a homeland when it has been died for.”

Our esteemed leader Dr. Necdet Koçak addressed his family and compatriots a few hours before his execution with the following words:

“Friends, a tree will produce leaves when it is pruned. I ask that you do not forsake the cause and continue. At the moment I am more at peace than ever. I go to God with peace in my soul. I am handing the flag to you. I am confident that you will bear it with honor. Do not stray from the path of truth and God. Be with God.”

We bear the flag handed over by our leaders with honor. We commemorate these honorable people with mercy and gratitude. The Turkmen community will never forget them.

May their souls rest in peace.

Dr. Hicran Kazancı
Iraqi Turkmen Front
Turkey Representative

Saturday 18 January 2014

‘Systematic torture’: Dossier accusing UK politicians of Iraq war crimes goes to ICC

‘Systematic torture’: Dossier accusing UK politicians of Iraq war crimes goes to ICC

by RT on 14-01-2014



The ICC has been urged to investigate the alleged war crimes of UK politicians during the Iraq conflict.






British paratroopers participate in exercises with helicopters from the 845 Royal Navy Squadron in the southern Iraqi city of Basra (AFP Photo)


A dossier detailing reports of sexual assault, torture and mock executions carried out by British soldiers in Iraq has been submitted to the Court.

The 250-page document entitled “The Responsibility of UK Officials for War Crimes Involving Systematic Detainee Abuse in Iraq from 2003-2008”, published by the German-based European Centre for Constitutional Human Rights, calls for "opening of an investigation” into the actions of senior British officials during the conflict.

The document compiles testimonies from over 400 Iraqis, constituting “thousands of allegations of mistreatment amounting to war crimes of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.” Among the documented crimes are brutal acts of physical abuse, including “hooding prisoners, electric shocks, burning, sexual assault, cultural and religious humiliation, rape and simulated executions.”

Given the scope and systematic nature of the crimes between 2003 and 2008, the Centre for Constitutional Human Rights lays the blame at the feet of “individuals at the highest levels” of the UK army and political system. The report alleges that members of the UK government were aware, or should have been aware, of the abuses being committed by their soldiers, but even so, failed to act.

“Civilian superiors knew or consciously disregarded information at their disposal, which clearly indicated that UK services personnel were committing war crimes in Iraq,” writes the report. It highlights a number of British politicians alleging their guilt of war crimes. Ex-defense secretary, Geoff Hoon, and army chief, General Sir Peter Wall, are just two of the high-ranking politicians implicated in the systematic abuse of Iraqi prisoners.

The complaint argues that "the pattern of abusive treatment by UK services personnel in Iraq continued over almost six years of military operations", as quoted by the Independent on Sunday, and calls for an investigation into the alleged war crimes, under Article 15 of the Rome Statute.

The UK government responded, saying it rejected claims of “systematic torture,” but regretted a “small number” of cases had taken place. In these cases, the UK claims the necessary legal steps were taken and the families of those affected were duly compensated.

“These matters are either under thorough investigation, or have been dealt with through various means including through the Iraq historic allegations team, independent public inquiries, the UK and European courts and in parliament,” a government spokesman said.

The ICC has previously stated “there was a reasonable basis to believe that crimes within the jurisdiction of the court had been committed, namely willful killing and inhuman treatment" by British soldiers. However, prosecutors said the number of cases – around 20 – was too little to warrant an investigation into possible war crimes.
‘Baseless rumors’

A number of accusations have been leveled at the UK military regarding acts of abuse during the Iraq occupation. British military officials rejected allegations that soldiers had mutilated the bodies of insurgents and abused detainees in the 2004 ‘Battle of Danny Boy’ in southern Iraq.

Colonel Adam Griffith told a London hearing in September that there was “no evidence to support this proposition”. He attributed the claims of Iraqi witnesses to their “ignorance as to the traumatic injuries that can be suffered in combat” and a smear campaign against the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Friday 17 January 2014

Shocking photos emerge showing U.S. Marines burning bodies of Iraqi insurgents


Followed by comment by Nicolas J "Sandy" Davies

Author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.  

Shocking photos emerge showing U.S. Marines burning bodies of Iraqi insurgents, posing for pictures with skeletons and even an enemy soldier's remains being eaten by a dog as Pentagon launches probe

  • The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, have sparked a Marine Corps investigation
  • However, many of the 41 shots, obtained by TMZ, are just too grisly to publish
  • Two pictures show a Marine pouring gasoline on the enemy remains, another two images show the Iraqi soldiers going up in flames while a fifth picture captures the charred bodies
  • U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, determined the photos had not been brought to their attention before
PUBLISHED: 17:49 GMT, 15 January 2014 | UPDATED: 19:56 GMT, 15 January 2014
Shocking images depicting U.S. soldiers burning the bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents, have emerged today.
The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation, but many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish.
Two pictures show a Marine pouring what looks like gasoline on the remains of enemy soldiers and another two images appear to show the remains go up in flames. Two more capture the horrifically charred bodies.
WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC CONTENT 

Horrific: Shocking images depicting U.S. soldiers burning the bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents, have emerged today
Horrific: Shocking images depicting U.S. soldiers burning the bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents, have emerged today
Burning: The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, appear to show U.S. soldier pouring gasoline on the bodies of Iraqi insurgents
Burning: The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, appear to show U.S. soldier pouring gasoline on the bodies of Iraqi insurgents

The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe.
According to the website, U.S. Central Command, which is in charge of military operations in the Middle East, reviewed the photos to determine if they had been brought to their attention before.
They determined they had not.
Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton.
Another picture shows a soldier rifling through the pockets of the scant remains of an Iraqi soldier.
TMZ said it has withheld the bulk of the images - including one showing a body being eaten by a dog - because they are just too graphic.


Grim: Many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish

Grim: Many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish

probe: The gruesome images have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation

probe: The gruesome images have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation


Charred: Two more pictures capture the horrifically charred bodies

Charred: Two more pictures capture the horrifically charred bodies
It reported seeing well over a dozen dead insurgents in total in the heinous pictures, in various states, including some covered in flies.
The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains.
There is no statute of limitations on the crime, which means the Marines can be prosecuted even if they're no longer active in the military. If convicted, the soldiers could go to prison.
'We are aware of photos appearing on TMZ.com that depict individuals in U.S. Marine uniforms burning what appear to be human remains,' Cmdr Bill Speaks, from the Secretary of Defense's office, told MailOnline Wednesday.
Pentagon: The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe
Pentagon: The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe

Posing: Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton
Posing: Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton

Pickpocket: The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains
Pickpocket: The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains

 'The Marine Corps is currently investigating the veracity of these photos, circumstances involved, and if possible, the identities of the service members involved.
'The findings from this investigation will determine whether we are able to move forward with any investigation into possible wrongdoing.'
Some have suggested the Marines may have been burning the remains as a sanitary measure.
However, Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Steven Warren said the proper handling of war remains is set by U.S. military regulation and that the actions depicted in the photos 'are not what we expect from our service members.'
Cmdr Speaks said the deplorable acts depicted in the images are not representative of the millions of hardworking men and women who have served in the Middle East.
'The actions depicted in these photos are not what we expect from our service members, nor do they represent the honorable and professional service of the more than 2.5 million Americans who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan,' he told MailOnline.
In 2005 report, U.S. soldiers in Gumbad, Afghanistan were investigated for burning the bodies of two enemy fighters.
The men argued they set alight the corpses for hygienic reasons, after local citizens had not retrieved the bodies after 24 hours.
A report concluded that the action indicated poor judgement but was not a war crime.
It stated: 'Based on the criminal investigation, there was no evidence to substantiate the allegation of desecration or any violation of the Law of War. However, there was evidence of poor decision-making and judgment, poor reporting and lack of knowledge and respect for local Afghan customs and tradition.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2539906/Shocking-photos-emerge-showing-U-S-Marines-burning-bodies-Iraqi-insurgents-posing-pictures-skeletons-enemy-soldiers-remains-eaten-dog-Pentagon-launches-probe.html
Read more:

Iraqi Death Scene

Pics of Marines Burning Bodies

Trigger U.S. Military Investigation [PHOTOS]

1/15/2014 11:00 AM PST BY TMZ STAFF
EXCLUSIVE
0114_marines_burning_bodies_investigation_launch
The United States military is conducting a formal investigation into American soldiers burning the dead bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents.
TMZ obtained 41 pictures that we're told were shot in Fallujah in 2004.  Two pictures show a Marine appearing to pour gasoline or some other flammable on the remains of what officials believe are 2 insurgents.  Two other photos show the bodies on fire.  You then see charred remains.
Another photo shows a Marine crouched down next to a dead body and mugging for the camera.
Still another pic shows a Marine rifling through the pocket of the pants on a corpse.
We have not included all of the photos.  Many are just too gruesome.  There are well over a dozen bodies in the pics and some are covered with flies and one is being eaten by a dog.
We turned them all over to the Pentagon last week, and a Pentagon official tells us the pics have triggered a Marine Corps investigation.
We're told U.S. Central Command -- the organization in charge of military operations in the Middle East -- also reviewed the photos to determine if they had been previously brought to their attention and determined they had not.
Col. Steve Warren, Director of Press Operations for the Dept. of Defense, tells TMZ ... the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice ... which makes it a crime to mishandle remains.
There is no statute of limitations on the crime -- even if the soldiers are now private citizens ... they can still be prosecuted, which could land them behind bars.
Col. Warren tells TMZ,  "The actions that are depicted in these photos are not in any way representative of the honorable, professional service of the 2 1/2  million service members who went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last decade."

The following comment is by Nicolas J "Sandy" Davies

Author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.  

 

What people in Fallujah reported at the time was that US troops were burning and burying bodies and dumping others in the river, and that these were mostly of civilians.  This was to cover up the fact that the assault on Fallujah was largely a massacre of civilians.
There are more details in Chapter 11 of my book, but essentially this took place during the weeks after the massacre, before relief workers from Fallujah Hospital were finally allowed to enter the city on December 25th and 26th.  They went through six of the city's 28 residential districts and found 700 bodies, of whom at least 550 were of women and children.  The Study Centre for Human Rights and Democracy in Fallujah eventually estimated that 4,000 to 6,000 people were killed in the massacre, but the disposal of bodies by the marines makes this highly uncertain and likely to be a serious under-estimate.
The Fallujah Compensation Committee reported in March 2005 that the assault destroyed 36,000 homes, 9,000 shops, 65 mosques, 60 schools, both train stations, one of the two bridges, two power stations, three water treatment plants and the city's entire sanitation and telephone systems.  Local authorities reported that 60% of houses were destroyed or uninhabitable.  There's a first-hand account in my book by a Marine who watched the final bombardment and destruction of Fallujah from a position on the outskirts of the city.  He concluded, "This wasn't a war, it was a massacre!"
Peace!
Nicolas J "Sandy" Davies
Author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.

STOP THE GENOCIDE OF TURKMENS IN IRAQ - Kopenhagında Türkmen Protesto'sından


Kopenhagında Türkmen Protesto'sından

Tuesday 14 January 2014

Iraq’s Oil Industry Stagnant In 2013


Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Iraq’s Oil Industry Stagnant In 2013

Posted by Joel Wing in Musings on Iraq

Despite hopes for continued growth, Iraq’s oil industry was stagnant in 2013. It not only exported less oil than 2012, but it didn’t earn as much either. That hasn’t stopped the Oil Ministry from predicting huge expansion in 2014. Most of the major oil fields in the south are going to increase production this year, but that can’t be exploited unless the government’s infrastructure projects are completed on time. There are several large ones that are to be finished by this summer. Baghdad has never done anything on schedule however, but they will eventually be finished, and when they are there will be a surge in oil exports. Until that happens Iraq will continue with its current 22-month plateau.


Iraq’s oil sales and revenue in 2013 were below its 2012 marks. For the year, Iraq averaged 2.388 million barrels a day in exports. Its crude sold for an average of $102.33 per barrel, which earned it an average of $7.434 billion per month. In total it made $89.231 billion in 2013. Those were all below 2012 when it averaged 2.41 million barrels in exports at $106.20 per barrel, which made it $7.835 billion per month, and $94.031 billion for the year. At the beginning of 2013 it looked like there would be a large jump in output when exports reached 2.62 million in April, but then it quickly fell and never recovered. Prices also dropped to below $100 a barrel from April to June when commodity traders believed that the Middle East was becoming more stable. Overall, the highest average price was $107.66 in February compared to $117.99 per barrel in March 2012. That accounted for the drop in profits. As for exports, the major cause for the decline was attacks and leaks that plagued the northern Kirkuk pipeline to Turkey, and the end of Kurdish contributions. In 2012 the Kurdistan Regional Government stopped exports through the Kirkuk line over disputes with Baghdad over paying companies that operated there. Then in 2013 the northern line exported an average of 264,200 barrels compared to 373,300 barrels in 2012. From June to July its oil flow dipped below 200,000 barrels a day when it faced non-stop leaks. According to the Northern Oil Company there were also 54 attacks upon the line by insurgents and oil smugglers in Ninewa and Salahaddin. In comparison, the south did see moderate growth going from an average of 2.042 million barrels in 2012 to 2.16 million in 2013. That latter figure would have been higher if not for repair work done in Basra from September and October. Iraq’s oil exports have not seen any real expansion since March 2012 when new mooring points were opened in the Basra. Without new infrastructure the country will continue on its current plateau.




Iraq Oil Exports And Profits 2011-2013


Iraq Oil Exports And Profits 2011-2013
Month
Avg.
Exports
(Mil/
Bar/
Day)
Avg. Price Per Barrel
Revenue (Bill)
Jan. 11
2.16
$90.78
$6.082
Feb.
2.20
$98.44
$6.064
Mar.
2.15
$107.13
$7.167
Apr.
2.14
$114.26
$7.342
May
2.22
$108
$7.45
Jun.
2.27
$105.17
$7.173
Jul.
2.16
$108.79
$7.311
Aug.
2.18
$104.91
$7.124
Sep.
2.10
$104.89
$6.619
Oct.
2.08
$104.04
$6.742
Nov.
2.13
$106.59
$6.833
Dec.
2.14
$106.18
$7.061
2011 Avg.
2.16
$105.00
$6.913
Jan. 12
2.10
$109.08
$7.123
Feb.
2.01
$112.92
$6.595
Mar.
2.31
$117.99
$8.472
Apr.
2.50
$116.79
$8.795
May
2.45
$103.03
$7.831
Jun.
2.40
$90.09
$6.487
Jul.
2.51
$97.14
$7.577
Aug.
2.56
$106.22
$8.445
Sep.
2.59
$107.59
$8.371
Oct.
2.62
$105.51
$8.578
Nov.
2.62
$104.32
$8.200
Dec.
2.34
$103.72
$7.551
2012
Avg. 
2.41
$106.20
$7.835
Jan. 13
2.35
$104.92
$7.667
Feb.
2.53
$107.66
$7.639
Mar.
2.41
$103.76
$7.773
Apr.
2.62
$98.70
$7.764
May
2.48
$97.23
$7.477
Jun.
2.33
$97.40
$6.799
Jul.
2.32
$101.00
$7.272
Aug.
2.58
$104.45
$8.356
Sep.
2.07
$104.87
$6.511
Oct.
2.25
$102.57
$7.160
Nov.
2.381
$102.57
$7.324
Dec.
2.341
$102.90
$7.47
2013 Avg.
2.388
$102.33
$7.434




Oil Exports Through Basra 2012-2013
January 2012 1.711 mil/bar/day
February 1.639 mil/bar/day
March 1.917 mil/bar/day
April 2.115 mil/bar/day
May 2.086 mil/bar/day
June 2.085 mil/bar/day
July 2.216 mil/bar/day
August 2.252 mil/bar/day
September 2.178 mil/bar/day
October 2.172 mil/bar/day
November 2.122 mil/bar/day
December 2.022 mil/bar/day
2012 Avg. 2.042 mil/bar/day
January 2013 2.093 mil/bar/day
February 2.196 mil/bar/day
March 2.1 mil/bar/day
April 2.31 mil/bar/day
May 2.19 mil/bar/day
June 2.13 mil/bar/day
July 2.32 mil/bar/day
August 2.30 mil/bar/day
September 1.90 mil/bar/day
October 2.06 mil/bar/day
November 2.281 mil/bar/day
December 2.081 mil/bar/day
2013 Avg. 2.16 mil/bar/day

Oil Exports Through Kirkuk 2012-2013
January 2012 393,500 bar/day
February 375,800 bar/day
March 400,000 bar/day
April 393,300 bar/day
May 364,500 bar/day
June 316,600 bar/day
July 300,000 bar/day
August 312,900 bar/day
September 420,000 bar/day
October 451,600 bar/day
November 426,600 bar/day
December 325,800 bar/day
2012 Avg. 373,300 bar/day
January 2013 264,500 bar/day
February 339,200 bar/day
March 316,100 bar/day
April 306,600 bar/day
May 283,800 bar/day
June 193,300 bar/day
July 180,600 bar/day
August 270,900 bar/day
September 250,000 bar/day
October 193,000 bar/day
November 309,00 bar/day
December 260,000 bar/day
2013 Avg. 264,200 bar/day


Baghdad has big plans for 2014, but it has never been able to meet its benchmarks. The 2013 budget for example, called for an average of 2.9 million barrels a day in exports. That was impossible after the Kurds stopped exporting in 2012. The 2014 draft budget calls for 3.4 million barrels in exports, but that again includes Kurdish exports, which is no closer to reality as it was in 2013. Still, the Oil Ministry has some major projects that are to be completed this year including new single point mooring ports and undersea pipelines in Basra. Without that the planned production increases at Badra, Gharraf, Halfaya, West Qurna 1 and 2, Zubayr, and Rumaila cannot be exploited, and will have to be ramped down, because Iraq lacks adequate storage facilities for excess output.


There’s no question that Iraq’s oil industry will grow, it will just be at a much slower rate than the Oil Ministry plans. Work is being done on the country’s major petroleum fields, infrastructure is being renovated and expanded. Unfortunately, government bureaucracy and red tape holds up contracting, imports, and visas, and then everything becomes backlogged. Hopefully by the second half of 2014 exports can grow and prices will have remained high, because Iraq needs so much in terms of rebuilding and development, and oil revenues fund all that.


SOURCES


Kakakhan, Aram, “Iraq Draft Budget Littered With Mines Against Kurdistan,” Rudaw, 12/28/13


Al-Najaf, Kamaran, Lando, Ben, and staff, “Oil exports end 2013 down but banner year ahead,” Iraq Oil Report, 1/3/14


Republic of Iraq Oil Ministry, “Crude Oil Exports”


Reuters, “Iraq oil exports average 2.341m bpd in December,” 1/2/14

Posted by Joel Wing at 7:17 AM